Imma tackle that Elephant in the room – the overwhelming creature that ‘Everyone’ is trying to ignore. This Elephant has a Name:
“The Why.”
It’s every Elephant-in-the-Room’s name. Once I know the Name of this specific Elephant? He’s not so scary to Me. So after dealing with a couple Elephants already, TECH knows to immediately set to work – when dealing with a New Elephant – to uncover the Pony in the pile of sh#t. [N: the Pony = The Why]
If You’ve been following Me through a few of My Stories, DR? You are already adding data to Your Own mental File labeled “Conner.” So far? Maybe these tales resonated strongly for You… or maybe? Your TECH is still “acquiring data” because You don’t know what to make of Me, yet. [N: either result is Right/Allowed/Correct]
But here’s a little more of The Why I want You “to know.”
- I’m changing all the names, to “protect the innocent.” This isn’t Historical documents, or tax forms, or receipts. This is Storytelling – and the plot of the Story is usually a Lesson [N: AKA The Money Shot] and not “Who IRL did/said X.” The IRL details are irrelevant, IMO.
- I’m using Hypothetical Scenarios that are intended to resonate with the greatest majority of Conceptual Folks. This means I will use a HS of “frying up bacon for breakfast” versus “explaining how to do a convoluted Calculus problem,” because My guess is more Folks “out there” can identify AKA “relate to” bacon versus Calculus.
- I’m trying to get Your SB “on My side,” DR.
I am trying to do a bunch of things at once; akin to a Clown at the Circus, juggling a bunch of balls in the air for Your – the Audience’s – entertainment. I want Your attention, and I will do “amazing & never-before-seen things” to get it.
“There’s a Method to My Madness.” This saying applies here.
How do You Trust Me, DR? Well, here’s some of the criteria I use when considering whether to trust any Other Person:
- “What’s in it for Them?” Sure, I can only see the top of that iceberg, but usually if I don’t see any velociraptors standing on the top of the ice, I assume there are no velociraptors hanging on to the bottom, ‘under the water line.’ [N: IRL mutual Experience data gathered with You ‘tells’ Me if I can continue to Trust You or not]
- “Is Their Actions consistent with Their Words?” This is easy to “Prove” in that One’s external behavior Never Lies.
- I recognize that at any moment the data ‘can change.’ [N: Historical data doesn’t change – what happened already is in the past. What I mean when I say “can change” means newly acquired data ‘is variant to’ the previously acquired data in the Files]
This third one is KEY. Sh#t happens, amiright? I acquire New data about Everything – about “stuff” and about “Other People I’m Connected with” on a daily basis. And I’ve trained TECH to Not suppress/ignore any of this data… but – in the interest of “establishing Equilibrium” – I also make sure TECH doesn’t try and suppress PASSION. PASSION is “My gut,” after all.
I Trust PASSION most of all.